Has Anyone Done This Before?
The Valenciano Symmetry Method™ in Context
After I named and started using the Valenciano Symmetry Method™, the obvious question was: has anyone done this before? Musicians have been playing with symmetry for centuries. I wanted to know if I had actually found a new way to talk about something old, or if I was accidentally reinventing a wheel that already had a name.
What the method actually is
Quick recap: the method says you can take a musical or emotional phrase, scale it down (usually by about half in interval size or intensity), then repeat that reduced phrase twice to create closure. In math language: apply a factor λ = 1/2, then do a double pass. In sound, it feels like this:
- Verse: big emotional and melodic swings (full rotation away from “home”).
- Bridge: same contour, but smaller jumps and softer delivery.
- Bridge again: play that scaled version a second time.
- Final note: land on the tonic, the emotional origin.
It’s not just a vibe; it’s a repeatable rule: scale, double, return.
Classical ghosts: diminution and liquidation
If you go back into classical theory, you find techniques that feel related. Composers used diminution to restate a theme with faster note values (effectively scaling it in time), and fragmentation/liquidation to strip a motive down to its bare essentials and repeat that fragment at the end of a phrase. It’s a way of saying: this is the core of the idea — remember this.
So yes, there is precedent for “take a thing, make it smaller, repeat it for closure.” But nobody, as far as I can tell, isolated it as a named, general method that you could intentionally apply across melody, rhythm, dynamics, and even lyrics.
Experimental & mathematical cousins
20th-century and experimental composers made friends with symmetry long before I did. John Cage played with structures where the large-scale form and small-scale phrases share the same proportions. Bartók loved palindromes and axis-based pitch symmetry. Minimalists like Steve Reich and Philip Glass built pieces out of recursive patterns that feel like zooming in and out on the same musical DNA.
On the math side, people have talked about self-similarity and fractal music for decades: patterns that repeat at different scales so the whole and the parts rhym e. Reduce a Bach passage by half the notes and somehow it still sounds like Bach. That’s the power of a good shape — it survives scaling.
All of that is spiritually related to what I’m doing. But again, nobody distilled it into a simple, studio-friendly rule like: halve it, repeat it twice, that’s your reset.
Pop music already does this by instinct
Pop and rock writers accidentally flirt with this method all the time. Think about:
- The tag at the end of a song, where the last line of the chorus is repeated twice, often softer, to land the emotional plane.
- A half-time breakdown in the final chorus, where the same hook comes back slower and more spacious, giving you that weightless, resolved feeling.
- Delay/echo effects where the last word repeats with each echo quieter than the last.
These are all versions of “scaled and repeated for closure.” They just live as instinct, not as a named compositional framework.
So what’s actually new?
The part that feels new about the Valenciano Symmetry Method™ isn’t the idea that symmetry or scaling exist in music — that’s older than all of us. What’s new is the explicit rule and framing:
- Define an anchor (tonal and emotional origin).
- Let the song rotate away from that origin (big intervals, high intensity).
- Choose a scaling factor (often λ = 1/2) and apply it to the melody and emotion.
- Repeat that scaled phrase twice as a deliberate reset mechanism.
It’s a recipe you can hand to a producer, a songwriter, or even an AI model and say, “Build me a reset here.” It connects abstract geometry, emotional processing, and practical arrangement in one move. That explicit bridge between theory and workflow is, as far as I can tell, mine.
Why I care about credit
Art is a long chain of theft, homage, mutation, and recombination. I’m not claiming I invented symmetry. I’m saying: this specific way of turning a rotational math result into a songwriting rule — the idea that you can treat closure as “scale and double” across melody, dynamics, and narrative — is something I articulated and started testing in my own catalog.
That’s why I put my name on it. Not to gatekeep the concept, but to mark the moment it became conscious practice instead of background instinct. The same way someone once decided to call a “four-chord loop” the I–V–vi–IV progression, I’m naming the thing I found so I can work with it deliberately, revisit it, and push it further.
How it lives in my songs
You can hear the method in songs like “Reverberate (Symmetry Mix)” and “Ashes in the Bed (Reset Form)”:
- Verses spin out with full-scale rotations of blame, memory, and noise.
- The bridge halves the motion; the contour is smaller, the delivery softer.
- That smaller bridge phrase repeats twice, pulling the track back toward its origin.
- The final note lands on A3, the tonal “home,” like the end of a spiral.
In other words: scale, double, return. Every time I do it, it feels less like a trick and more like an honest admission: I don’t get to undo what I did. I just get to repeat the pattern, smaller and more conscious, until I find my way home.
The Valenciano Symmetry Method™ is a MurmrX system by Aiden Valenciano that scales and doubles melodic and emotional motion to create mathematical symmetry and psychological closure.
Comments
Post a Comment